linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] tpm/tpm_svsm: support TPM_CHIP_FLAG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aDCb-wkHGoLQ-IGg@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 19:02:03 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
	Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
	linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
	Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...nel.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
	Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] tpm/tpm_svsm: support TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SYNC

On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:26:34AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2025 at 18:42, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 01:12:20PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > I tried, but the last patch (this one) is based on the series merged
> > > > on the tip tree, where I introduced tpm_svsm.
> > > > I can see that series in linux-next merged with commit
> > > > 16a56ee59ab8ee05e67de35bbb5782ef9cfb4f07,
> > > > but I can't see it in your next tree [1].
> > > >
> > > > How do we proceed in such cases?
> > > >
> > > > Just to be sure, did I use the right tree?
> > >
> > > Thanks for the remark. Lemme check tonight. Hold on doing
> > > anything ;-) We'll get there...
> >
> > I just rebased my branches on top of latest from Linus. That is what I
> > need base PR also on, and:
> >
> > $ git show 16a56ee59ab8ee05e67de35bbb5782ef9cfb4f07
> > fatal: bad object 16a56ee59ab8ee05e67de35bbb5782ef9cfb4f07
> >
> > I'd use git cherry-pick on a range to take them from linux-next to a
> > mainline tip...
> 
> I see, let me know if I can help in some way.
> 
> We can also wait the next cycle if it simplifies your work, definitely
> no rush on my side.

Let's do it. At least it will then get a full round of testing before
ending up to a release.

Thank you!

> 
> Thanks,
> Stefano

BR, Jarkko