linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] selftests: Add perf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9e494704-6098-463a-932e-f1b8311c4cf8@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 19:53:41 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Eric Smith <eric.smith@....qualcomm.com>, rafael@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 ulf.hansson@...aro.org, arnd@...aro.org, saravanak@...gle.com,
 deepti.jaggi@....qualcomm.com, prasad.sodagudi@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] selftests: Add perf_qos selftests

On 23/05/2025 19:43, Eric Smith wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On 5/5/2025 9:19 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> 
>> This patch provides somes tests which depend on a kernel module
>> creating a dummy performance QoS device. More tests will be added
>> later.
> 
> Thanks, I did not see a test where the perf_qos_is_allowed API is used.
> In future patches, can you add a test using the perf_qos_is_allowed API?

Sure, thanks for pointing this out


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog