[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250523181448.3777233-3-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 23:44:45 +0530
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de, yury.norov@...il.com,
maddy@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: sshegde@...ux.ibm.com, vschneid@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, jstultz@...gle.com, kprateek.nayak@....com,
huschle@...ux.ibm.com, srikar@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...musvillemoes.dk
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/5] sched/core: Don't use parked cpu for selection
When the current running task is pushed using stop class mechanism, the
new CPU that going to be chosen shouldn't be a parked CPU.
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 62b3416f5e43..9ec12f9b3b08 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3526,7 +3526,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
nodemask = cpumask_of_node(nid);
/* Look for allowed, online CPU in same node. */
- for_each_cpu(dest_cpu, nodemask) {
+ for_each_cpu_andnot(dest_cpu, nodemask, cpu_parked_mask) {
if (is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu))
return dest_cpu;
}
@@ -3534,7 +3534,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
for (;;) {
/* Any allowed, online CPU? */
- for_each_cpu(dest_cpu, p->cpus_ptr) {
+ for_each_cpu_andnot(dest_cpu, p->cpus_ptr, cpu_parked_mask) {
if (!is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu))
continue;
--
2.39.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists