[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b197893b-37f2-47de-ad4b-801192ea3e7a@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 21:47:41 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, <corbet@....net>, <tony.luck@...el.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <james.morse@....com>, <dave.martin@....com>, <fenghuay@...dia.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>, <paulmck@...nel.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <thuth@...hat.com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<ardb@...nel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>, <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
<alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>, <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
<thomas.lendacky@....com>, <perry.yuan@....com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>,
<kai.huang@...el.com>, <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>, <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
<xin3.li@...el.com>, <ebiggers@...gle.com>, <xin@...or.com>,
<sohil.mehta@...el.com>, <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
<mario.limonciello@....com>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <peternewman@...gle.com>,
<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, <eranian@...gle.com>,
<Xiaojian.Du@....com>, <gautham.shenoy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 23/27] x86/resctrl: Introduce mbm_L3_assignments to
list assignments in a group
Hi Babu,
On 5/15/25 3:52 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
> Introduce the interface to display the assignment states for each group
> when mbm_cntr_assign mode is enabled.
>
> The list is displayed in the following format:
> <Event configuration>:<Domain id>=<Assignment type>
Should this just be <Event>? The information is just the event name, not
its configuration that will be in the "event_filter" file.
>
> Event configuration: A valid event configuration listed in the
> /sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/counter_configs directory.
>
> Domain ID: A valid domain ID number.
>
> The assignment type can be one of the following:
>
> _ : No event configuration assigned
>
> e : Event configuration assigned in exclusive mode
>
> Example:
> $cd /sys/fs/resctrl
> $cat mbm_L3_assignments
> mbm_total_bytes:0=e;1=e
> mbm_local_bytes:0=e;1=e
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
> ---
> v13: Changelog update.
> Few changes in mbm_L3_assignments_show() after moving the event config to evt_list.
> Resolved conflicts caused by the recent FS/ARCH code restructure.
> The rdtgroup.c/monitor.c files have been split between the FS and ARCH directories.
>
> v12: New patch:
> Assignment interface moved inside the group based the discussion
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALPaoCiii0vXOF06mfV=kVLBzhfNo0SFqt4kQGwGSGVUqvr2Dg@mail.gmail.com/#t
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst | 28 +++++++++++++++
> fs/resctrl/monitor.c | 1 +
> fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst
> index 356f1f918a86..2350c1f21f4e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst
> @@ -504,6 +504,34 @@ When the "mba_MBps" mount option is used all CTRL_MON groups will also contain:
> /sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/mon_features changes the input
> event.
>
> +"mbm_L3_assignments":
> + This interface file is created when the mbm_cntr_assign mode is supported
"This interface file is created when" -> "Exists when mbm_cntr_assign mode is supported"?
> + and shows the assignment status for each group.
This doc is in the portion documenting files in monitor groups. So rather:
"the assignment status for each group" -> "the counter assignment status for the MON group"?
> +
> + The assignment list is displayed in the following format:
> +
> + <Event configuration>:<Domain id>=<Assignment type>
<Event configuration> -> <Event>
> +
> + Event configuration: A valid event configuration listed in the
"A valid event in the /sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/event_configs directory"
> + /sys/fs/resctrl/info/L3_MON/counter_configs directory.
> +
> + Domain ID: A valid domain ID number.
"A valid domain ID"
> +
> + Assignment types:
> +
> + _ : No event configuration assigned
hmmm ... since the line has event as first field, would this not reflect the
counter? That is "No counter assigned"
> +
> + e : Event configuration assigned in exclusive mode
"Counter assigned exclusively"? (with exclusive defined somewhere)
> +
> + Example:
> + To list the assignment states for the default group.
"the counter assignment states"?
> + ::
> +
> + # cd /sys/fs/resctrl
> + # cat mbm_L3_assignments
> + mbm_total_bytes:0=e;1=e
> + mbm_local_bytes:0=e;1=e
> +
> Resource allocation rules
> -------------------------
>
> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/monitor.c b/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
> index 5f6c4b662f3b..b982540ce4e3 100644
> --- a/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -935,6 +935,7 @@ int resctrl_mon_resource_init(void)
> resctrl_file_fflags_init("event_filter", RFTYPE_ASSIGN_CONFIG);
> resctrl_file_fflags_init("mbm_assign_on_mkdir", RFTYPE_MON_INFO |
> RFTYPE_RES_CACHE);
> + resctrl_file_fflags_init("mbm_L3_assignments", RFTYPE_MON_BASE);
> }
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 931ea355f159..8d970b99bbbd 100644
> --- a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -2080,6 +2080,52 @@ static ssize_t resctrl_mbm_assign_on_mkdir_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> return ret ?: nbytes;
> }
>
> +static int mbm_L3_assignments_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of, struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> +{
> + struct rdt_resource *r = resctrl_arch_get_resource(RDT_RESOURCE_L3);
> + struct rdt_mon_domain *d;
> + struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp;
> + struct mon_evt *mevt;
> + int ret = 0;
> + bool sep;
> +
> + rdtgrp = rdtgroup_kn_lock_live(of->kn);
> + if (!rdtgrp)
> + return -ENOENT;
Missing a rdtgroup_kn_unlock()?
> +
> + rdt_last_cmd_clear();
> + if (!resctrl_arch_mbm_cntr_assign_enabled(r)) {
> + rdt_last_cmd_puts("mbm_cntr_assign mode not enabled\n");
> + ret = -ENOENT;
> + goto assign_out;
grep goto fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> + }
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(mevt, &r->mon.evt_list, list) {
can use for_each_mbm_event() and then below will not be needed?
> + if (mevt->mbm_mode != MBM_MODE_ASSIGN)
> + continue;
> +
> + sep = false;
> + seq_printf(s, "%s:", mevt->name);
> + list_for_each_entry(d, &r->mon_domains, hdr.list) {
> + if (sep)
> + seq_putc(s, ';');
> +
> + if (mbm_cntr_get(r, d, rdtgrp, mevt->evtid) >= 0)
> + seq_printf(s, "%d=e", d->hdr.id);
> + else
> + seq_printf(s, "%d=_", d->hdr.id);
> +
> + sep = true;
> + }
> + seq_putc(s, '\n');
> + }
> +
> +assign_out:
> + rdtgroup_kn_unlock(of->kn);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /* rdtgroup information files for one cache resource. */
> static struct rftype res_common_files[] = {
> {
> @@ -2218,6 +2264,12 @@ static struct rftype res_common_files[] = {
> .seq_show = event_filter_show,
> .write = event_filter_write,
> },
> + {
> + .name = "mbm_L3_assignments",
> + .mode = 0444,
> + .kf_ops = &rdtgroup_kf_single_ops,
> + .seq_show = mbm_L3_assignments_show,
> + },
> {
> .name = "mbm_assign_mode",
> .mode = 0444,
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists