[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb5bb014-9acc-4ba3-859c-c9fb50c3b4b2@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 14:40:12 +0800
From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>, James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] KVM: TDX: Move TDX hardware setup from main.c to
tdx.c
On 5/23/2025 10:27 AM, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> On 5/23/2025 8:11 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> Move TDX hardware setup to tdx.c, as the code is obviously TDX specific,
>> co-locating the setup with tdx_bringup() makes it easier to see and
>> document the success_disable_tdx "error" path, and configuring the TDX
>> specific hooks in tdx.c reduces the number of globally visible TDX
>> symbols.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h
>> index 51f98443e8a2..ca39a9391db1 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h
>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_INTEL_TDX
>> #include "common.h"
>> +void tdx_hardware_setup(void);
>
> we need define stub function for the case of !CONFIG_KVM_INTEL_TDX
sorry that I missed the discussion on v3[*].
Based on kvm-x86/next, no issue.
[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aC0MIUOTQbb9-a7k@google.com/
> with it fixed,
>
> Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists