[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73509a8c-7141-49d7-b6d4-25a271fbad2c@windriver.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 14:52:04 +0800
From: "Yan, Haixiao (CN)" <haixiao.yan.cn@...driver.com>
To: NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>
Cc: chuck.lever@...cle.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfs mount failed with ipv6 addr
On 5/23/2025 7:21 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
> On Thu, 22 May 2025, Haixiao Yan wrote:
>> On 2025/5/22 07:32, NeilBrown wrote:
>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>>>
>>> On Thu, 22 May 2025, Yan, Haixiao (CN) wrote:
>>>> On linux-5.10.y, my testcase run failed:
>>>>
>>>> root@...el-x86-64:/opt/wr-test/testcases/userspace/nfs-utils_v6# mount -t nfs [::1]:/mnt/nfs_root /mnt/v6 -o nfsvers=3
>>>> mount.nfs: requested NFS version or transport protocol is not supported
>>>>
>>>> The first bad commit is:
>>>>
>>>> commit 7229200f68662660bb4d55f19247eaf3c79a4217
>>>> Author: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
>>>> Date: Mon Jun 3 10:35:02 2024 -0400
>>>>
>>>> nfsd: don't allow nfsd threads to be signalled.
>>>>
>>>> [ Upstream commit 3903902401451b1cd9d797a8c79769eb26ac7fe5 ]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here is the test log:
>>>>
>>>> root@...el-x86-64:/opt/wr-test/testcases/userspace/nfs-utils_v6# dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/nfs.img bs=1M count=100
>>>> 100+0 records in
>>>> 100+0 records out
>>>> 104857600 bytes (105 MB, 100 MiB) copied, 0.0386658 s, 2.7 GB/s
>>>> root@...el-x86-64:/opt/wr-test/testcases/userspace/nfs-utils_v6# mkfs /tmp/nfs.img
>>>> mke2fs 1.46.1 (9-Feb-2021)
>>>> Discarding device blocks: 1024/102400............. .............done
>>>> Creating filesystem with 102400 1k blocks and 25688 inodes
>>>> Filesystem UUID: 77e3bc56-46bb-4e5c-9619-d9a0c0999958
>>>> Superblock backups stored on blocks:
>>>> 8193, 24577, 40961, 57345, 73729
>>>>
>>>> Allocating group tables: 0/13..... .....done
>>>> Writing inode tables: 0/13..... .....done
>>>> Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: 0/13..... .....done
>>>> root@...el-x86-64:/opt/wr-test/testcases/userspace/nfs-utils_v6# mount /tmp/nfs.img /mnt
>>>>
>>>> root@...el-x86-64:/opt/wr-test/testcases/userspace/nfs-utils_v6# mkdir /mnt/nfs_root
>>>>
>>>> root@...el-x86-64:/opt/wr-test/testcases/userspace/nfs-utils_v6# touch /etc/exports
>>>>
>>>> root@...el-x86-64:/opt/wr-test/testcases/userspace/nfs-utils_v6# echo '/mnt/nfs_root *(insecure,rw,async,no_root_squash)' >> /etc/exports
>>>>
>>>> root@...el-x86-64:/opt/wr-test/testcases/userspace/nfs-utils_v6# /opt/wr-test/bin/svcwp.sh nfsserver restart
>>>> stopping mountd: done
>>>> stopping nfsd: ..........failed
>>>> using signal 9:
>>>> ..........failed
>>> What does your "nfsserver" script do to try to stop/restart the nfsd?
>>> For a very long time the approved way to stop nfsd has been to run
>>> "rpc.nfsd 0". My guess is that whatever script you are using still
>>> trying to send a signal to nfsd. That no longer works.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately the various sysv-init scripts for starting/stopping nfsd
>>> have never been part of nfs-utils so we were not able to update them.
>>> nfs-utils *does* contain systemd unit files for sites which use systemd.
>>>
>>> If you have a non-systemd way of starting/stopping nfsd, we would be
>>> happy to make the relevant scripts part of nfs-utils so that we can
>>> ensure they stay up to date.
>> Actually, we use service nfsserver restart =>
>> /etc/init.d/nfsserver =>
>>
>> stop_nfsd(){
>> # WARNING: this kills any process with the executable
>> # name 'nfsd'.
>> echo -n 'stopping nfsd: '
>> start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --signal 1 --name nfsd
>> if delay_nfsd || {
>> echo failed
>> echo ' using signal 9: '
>> start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --signal 9 --name nfsd
>> delay_nfsd
>> }
>> then
>> echo done
>> else
>> echo failed
>> fi
> The above should all be changed to
> echo -n 'stopping nfsd: '
> rpc.nfsd 0
> echo done
>
> or similar. What distro are you using?
>
> I can't see how this would affect your problem with IPv6 but it would be
> nice if you could confirm that IPv6 still doesn't work even after
> changing the above.
> What version of nfs-utils are you using?
> Are you should that the kernel has IPv6 enabled? Does "ping6 ::1" work?
>
> NeilBrown
>
It works as expected.
My distro is Yocto and nfs-utils 2.5.3.
Thanks,
Haixiao
>> }
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Haixiao
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> NeilBrown
Powered by blists - more mailing lists