[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <469db7d1-ba99-4dc7-af13-b5fe850d4031@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 14:55:34 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: david@...hat.com, ziy@...dia.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, ryan.roberts@....com, dev.jain@....com,
corbet@....net, rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
baohua@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org, peterx@...hat.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, usamaarif642@...il.com, sunnanyong@...wei.com,
vishal.moola@...il.com, thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com,
yang@...amperecomputing.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, raquini@...hat.com, anshuman.khandual@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, tiwai@...e.de, will@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, jack@...e.cz, cl@...two.org,
jglisse@...gle.com, surenb@...gle.com, zokeefe@...gle.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, rientjes@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/12] khugepaged: generalize hugepage_vma_revalidate
for mTHP support
On 2025/5/15 11:22, Nico Pache wrote:
> For khugepaged to support different mTHP orders, we must generalize this
> to check if the PMD is not shared by another VMA and the order is
> enabled.
>
> No functional change in this patch.
>
> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Co-developed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
> ---
> mm/khugepaged.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 5457571d505a..0c4d6a02d59c 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static int khugepaged_find_target_node(struct collapse_control *cc)
> static int hugepage_vma_revalidate(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> bool expect_anon,
> struct vm_area_struct **vmap,
> - struct collapse_control *cc)
> + struct collapse_control *cc, int order)
> {
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> unsigned long tva_flags = cc->is_khugepaged ? TVA_ENFORCE_SYSFS : 0;
> @@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ static int hugepage_vma_revalidate(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
>
> if (!thp_vma_suitable_order(vma, address, PMD_ORDER))
Sorry, I missed this before. Should we also change 'PMD_ORDER' to
'order' for the thp_vma_suitable_order()?
> return SCAN_ADDRESS_RANGE;
> - if (!thp_vma_allowable_order(vma, vma->vm_flags, tva_flags, PMD_ORDER))
> + if (!thp_vma_allowable_order(vma, vma->vm_flags, tva_flags, order))
> return SCAN_VMA_CHECK;
> /*
> * Anon VMA expected, the address may be unmapped then
> @@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> goto out_nolock;
>
> mmap_read_lock(mm);
> - result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, cc);
> + result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, cc, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
> mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> goto out_nolock;
> @@ -1164,7 +1164,7 @@ static int collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> * mmap_lock.
> */
> mmap_write_lock(mm);
> - result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, cc);
> + result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, address, true, &vma, cc, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED)
> goto out_up_write;
> /* check if the pmd is still valid */
> @@ -2782,7 +2782,7 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct **prev,
> mmap_read_lock(mm);
> mmap_locked = true;
> result = hugepage_vma_revalidate(mm, addr, false, &vma,
> - cc);
> + cc, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> if (result != SCAN_SUCCEED) {
> last_fail = result;
> goto out_nolock;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists