[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65f95a57-64cb-4815-8ff2-9021ab7b7ae3@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 09:12:08 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>, i@...insx.cn
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, heiko@...ech.de, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add DTs for Firefly
ROC-RK3588S-PC
On 23/05/2025 09:00, Chukun Pan wrote:
>
>> +&gmac1 {
>> + clock_in_out = "output";
>> + phy-handle = <&rgmii_phy1>;
>> + phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
>> + pinctrl-0 = ...
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>
> pinctrl-names should be placed before pinctrl-0
That's unusual - not inline with common coding style and with most of
SoCs. Is this some kind of known rule valid in Rockchip?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists