[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250523-fancy-upbeat-stoat-e9ecbd@kuoka>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 10:12:43 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@...aro.org>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: ignore "wsa" from
being selected as SoC component
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 06:40:52PM GMT, Alexey Klimov wrote:
> The pattern matching incorrectly selects "wsa" because of "sa" substring
> and evaluates it as a SoC component or block.
>
> Wsa88xx are family of amplifiers and should not be evaluated here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@...aro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
> index a77d68dcad4e52e4fee43729ac8dc1caf957262e..99521813a04ca416fe90454a811c4a13143efce3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom-soc.yaml
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ description: |
> select:
> properties:
> compatible:
> - pattern: "^qcom,.*(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcm|qcs|q[dr]u|sa|sar|sc|sd[amx]|sm|x1[ep])[0-9]+.*$"
> + pattern: "^qcom,(?!.*wsa)(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcm|qcs|q[dr]u|sa|sar|sc|sd[amx]|smx1[ep])[0-9]+.*$"
Why dropping front .*? Are you sure this matches what we want - so
incorrect compatibles? To me it breaks the entire point of this select,
so I am sure you did not test whether it still works. To remind: this is
to select incorrect compatibles.
(?!wsa)
Because qcom,x-wsa8845 should be matched and cause warnings.
And probably we are getting past the point of readability, so could you
try:
compatible:
anyOf:
- pattern: "^qcom,.*(apq|ipq|mdm|msm|qcm|qcs|q[dr]u|sar|sc|sd[amx]|sm|x1[ep])[0-9]+.*$"
- pattern: "^qcom,.*(?!wsa)sa[0-9]+.*$"
> required:
> - compatible
>
>
> --
> 2.47.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists