[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250523083909.84517-2-junan76@163.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 16:39:10 +0800
From: junan <junan76@....com>
To: maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
mripard@...nel.org,
airlied@...il.com,
simona@...ll.ch,
tzimmermann@...e.de
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
junan76@....com
Subject: [PATCH] DRM: Fix rbtree search issue of find_hole_addr
I'm not sure if it is a bug or just for some special purposes in the function
"find_hole_addr", the original implementation is as follows:
static struct drm_mm_node *find_hole_addr(struct drm_mm *mm, u64 addr, u64 size)
{
struct rb_node *rb = mm->holes_addr.rb_node;
struct drm_mm_node *node = NULL;
while (rb) {
u64 hole_start;
if (!usable_hole_addr(rb, size))
break;
node = rb_hole_addr_to_node(rb);
hole_start = __drm_mm_hole_node_start(node);
if (addr < hole_start)
rb = node->rb_hole_addr.rb_left;
else if (addr > hole_start + node->hole_size)
rb = node->rb_hole_addr.rb_right;
else
break;
}
return node;
}
I think that the "node" should be set to NULL if it is not the one we want,
please tell me if I am wrong.
Signed-off-by: junan <junan76@....com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
index ca254611b382..9417911198b5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
@@ -347,6 +347,8 @@ static struct drm_mm_node *find_hole_addr(struct drm_mm *mm, u64 addr, u64 size)
rb = node->rb_hole_addr.rb_right;
else
break;
+
+ node = NULL;
}
return node;
--
2.43.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists