linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rust tree with the pm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72kfGWQ_CdJ21UPsGsNSfo1tgUXgNR2ur5QiA6-8WJ3nAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 11:42:15 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, 
	Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>, Igor Korotin <igor.korotin.linux@...il.com>, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rust tree with the pm tree

On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 8:20 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Looks OK to me, thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel