[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250523095322.88774-2-chao.gao@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 02:52:24 -0700
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com,
eddie.dong@...el.com,
kirill.shutemov@...el.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com,
kai.huang@...el.com,
isaku.yamahata@...el.com,
elena.reshetova@...el.com,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 01/20] x86/virt/tdx: Print SEAMCALL leaf numbers in decimal
Both TDX spec and kernel defines SEAMCALL leaf numbers as decimal. Printing
them in hex makes no sense. Correct it.
Suggested-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
Tested-by: Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@...el.com>
---
arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
index f5e2a937c1e7..49267c865f18 100644
--- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ typedef void (*sc_err_func_t)(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *args);
static inline void seamcall_err(u64 fn, u64 err, struct tdx_module_args *args)
{
- pr_err("SEAMCALL (0x%016llx) failed: 0x%016llx\n", fn, err);
+ pr_err("SEAMCALL (%lld) failed: 0x%016llx\n", fn, err);
}
static inline void seamcall_err_ret(u64 fn, u64 err,
--
2.47.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists