linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] tools/nolibc: move ioctl() to sys/ioctl.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aDBKiafQmW8mGuN8@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 11:14:33 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] tools/nolibc: move ioctl() to sys/ioctl.h

On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 10:33:13AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2025-05-21 19:49:39+0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > That seems to build with 869c788909b93a78ead1ca28c42b95eeb0779215 which
> > is the current HEAD of:

> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git for-next

> Thanks for testing!

> To be sure, was this your full test-run? Or did you do a full test-run

Just a build of the arm64 selftests (which are the only thing I build
that was affected).

> on linux-next in the meantime?
> I'd like to get your confirmation before sending these changes to Linus.

Today's -next appears to have built and be running the arm64 selftests
OK again in my personal CI:

   https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/1419721#L2482

There shoud also be results (both build and runtime) from KernelCI:

   https://dashboard.kernelci.org/

but there might be a bit more lag seeing the results there.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)