[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <q6o6jrgwpdt67xsztsqjmewt66kjv6btyayazk7zlk4zjoww4n@2zzowgibx5ka>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 10:10:02 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] overlayfs + casefolding
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 04:33:14PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> I am saying that IMO a smaller impact (and less user friendly) fix is more
> appropriate way to deal with this problem.
What do you think about doing your approach as a stopgap?
It seems this is hitting a lot of people, something we can backport to
6.15 would be good to have.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists