[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP=Rh=NewbpXABhEECGAfBaA_1XtijWDhrainjuKZc6WYXrQZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 09:10:17 +0800
From: John <john.cs.hey@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug] "soft lockup in inet6_release“ in Linux Kernel v6.15-rc5
Dear Linux Kernel Maintainers,
I hope this message finds you well.
I am writing to report a potential vulnerability I encountered during
testing of the Linux Kernel version v6.15-rc5.
Git Commit: 92a09c47464d040866cf2b4cd052bc60555185fb (tag: v6.15-rc5)
Bug Location: 0010:perf_trace_buf_update+0x19/0x190
kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c:429
Bug report: https://hastebin.com/share/udusequyew.bash
Complete log: https://hastebin.com/share/ibalexehon.perl
Entire kernel config: https://hastebin.com/share/padecilimo.ini
Root Cause Analysis:
A soft lockup was detected on CPU#0 with the instruction pointer (RIP)
stuck in the perf_trace_buf_update() function (at
kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c:429).
This function was invoked indirectly as part of the inet6_release()
socket cleanup path, during the final phase of socket destruction
(__sk_destruct() → sk_prot_free() → tracing path).
At present, I have not yet obtained a minimal reproducer for this
issue. However, I am actively working on reproducing it, and I will
promptly share any additional findings or a working reproducer as soon
as it becomes available.
Thank you very much for your time and attention to this matter. I
truly appreciate the efforts of the Linux kernel community.
Best regards,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists