[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aDCK00bzc6RDKu5s@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 10:48:51 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: John Ernberg <john.ernberg@...ia.se>
Cc: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>,
Gaurav Jain <gaurav.jain@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] crypto: caam - Prevent crash on suspend with iMX8QM
/ iMX8ULP
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 02:19:38PM +0000, John Ernberg wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> On 5/23/25 3:53 PM, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 01:18:32PM +0000, John Ernberg wrote:
> >> Since the CAAM on these SoCs is managed by another ARM core, called the
> >> SECO (Security Controller) on iMX8QM and Secure Enclave on iMX8ULP, which
> >> also reserves access to register page 0 suspend operations cannot touch
> >> this page.
> >>
> >> Introduce a variable to track this situation. Since this is synonymous
> >> with the optee case in suspend/resume the optee check is replaced with
> >> this new check.
> >>
> >> Fixes the following splat at suspend:
> >>
> >> Internal error: synchronous external abort: 0000000096000010 [#1] SMP
> >> Hardware name: Freescale i.MX8QXP ACU6C (DT)
> >> pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> >> pc : readl+0x0/0x18
> >> lr : rd_reg32+0x18/0x3c
> >> sp : ffffffc08192ba20
> >> x29: ffffffc08192ba20 x28: ffffff8025190000 x27: 0000000000000000
> >> x26: ffffffc0808ae808 x25: ffffffc080922338 x24: ffffff8020e89090
> >> x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffffffc080922000 x21: ffffff8020e89010
> >> x20: ffffffc080387ef8 x19: ffffff8020e89010 x18: 000000005d8000d5
> >> x17: 0000000030f35963 x16: 000000008f785f3f x15: 000000003b8ef57c
> >> x14: 00000000c418aef8 x13: 00000000f5fea526 x12: 0000000000000001
> >> x11: 0000000000000002 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : 0000000000000000
> >> x8 : ffffff8025190870 x7 : ffffff8021726880 x6 : 0000000000000002
> >> x5 : ffffff80217268f0 x4 : ffffff8021726880 x3 : ffffffc081200000
> >> x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : ffffff8020e89010 x0 : ffffffc081200004
> >> Call trace:
> >> readl+0x0/0x18
> >> caam_ctrl_suspend+0x30/0xdc
> >> dpm_run_callback.constprop.0+0x24/0x5c
> >> device_suspend+0x170/0x2e8
> >> dpm_suspend+0xa0/0x104
> >> dpm_suspend_start+0x48/0x50
> >> suspend_devices_and_enter+0x7c/0x45c
> >> pm_suspend+0x148/0x160
> >> state_store+0xb4/0xf8
> >> kobj_attr_store+0x14/0x24
> >> sysfs_kf_write+0x38/0x48
> >> kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xb4/0x178
> >> vfs_write+0x118/0x178
> >> ksys_write+0x6c/0xd0
> >> __arm64_sys_write+0x14/0x1c
> >> invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x64/0xb0
> >> do_el0_svc+0x90/0xb0
> >> el0_svc+0x18/0x44
> >> el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0x124
> >> el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154
> >> Code: 88dffc21 88dffc21 5ac00800 d65f03c0 (b9400000)
> >>
> >> Fixes: d2835701d93c ("crypto: caam - i.MX8ULP donot have CAAM page0 access")
> >> Fixes: 61bb8db6f682 ("crypto: caam - Add support for i.MX8QM")
> >> Cc: stable@...nel.org # v6.10+
> >> Signed-off-by: John Ernberg <john.ernberg@...ia.se>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> I noticed this when enabling the iMX8QXP support (next patch), hence the
> >> iMX8QXP backtrace, but the iMX8QM CAAM integration works exactly the same
> >> and according to the NXP tree [1] the iMX8ULP suffers the same issue.
> >>
> >> [1]: https://github.com/nxp-imx/linux-imx/commit/653712ffe52dd59f407af1b781ce318f3d9e17bb
> >> ---
> >> drivers/crypto/caam/ctrl.c | 5 +++--
> >> drivers/crypto/caam/intern.h | 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/caam/ctrl.c b/drivers/crypto/caam/ctrl.c
> >> index 38ff931059b4..766c447c9cfb 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/crypto/caam/ctrl.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/crypto/caam/ctrl.c
> >> @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ static int caam_ctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >> {
> >> const struct caam_drv_private *ctrlpriv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >>
> >> - if (ctrlpriv->caam_off_during_pm && !ctrlpriv->optee_en)
> >> + if (ctrlpriv->caam_off_during_pm && !ctrlpriv->no_page0)
> >> caam_state_save(dev);
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> @@ -842,7 +842,7 @@ static int caam_ctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
> >> struct caam_drv_private *ctrlpriv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >> int ret = 0;
> >>
> >> - if (ctrlpriv->caam_off_during_pm && !ctrlpriv->optee_en) {
> >> + if (ctrlpriv->caam_off_during_pm && !ctrlpriv->no_page0) {
> >> caam_state_restore(dev);
> >>
> >> /* HW and rng will be reset so deinstantiation can be removed */
> >> @@ -908,6 +908,7 @@ static int caam_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>
> >> imx_soc_data = imx_soc_match->data;
> >> reg_access = reg_access && imx_soc_data->page0_access;
> >> + ctrlpriv->no_page0 = !reg_access;
> >
> > If you want to use no_page0 to control if call caam_state_save(), you'd
> > better set ctrlpriv->no_page0 also after ctrlpriv->optee_en = !!np;
> >
> > Frank
>
> I'm not sure I understand, I cannot see a code path where no_page0 will
> be (un)set incorrectly.
>
> optee disables the page0 access, so reg_access is already the inverse of
> optee_en. reg_access == false when optee_en == true.
>
> Thus, if optee is loaded on a SoC that normally has page0_access the
> `reg_access = reg_access && imx_soc_data->page0_access;` statement on
> the line above setting no_page0 already takes care of it, so:
> reg_access = false && true -> false.
>
> Similarly if both reg_access == false and page0_access == false,
> reg_access will still be false.
Okay, I check original code. You are right. You'd better to add descripton
in commit message about no_page0 is true when optee_en is true.
Frank
>
> Thanks! // John Ernberg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists