[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nt2e4gqhefkqqhce62chepz7atytai2anymrn6ce47vcgubwsq@a6baualpdmty>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 14:21:04 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@...ian.org>, Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, Krzysztof Wilczy??ski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/pwrctrl: Skip creating platform device unless
CONFIG_PCI_PWRCTL enabled
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 08:29:46AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 09:42:07PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > What I would prefer is something like the first paragraph in that
> > section: the #ifdef in a header file that declares the function and
> > defines a no-op stub, with the implementation in some pwrctrl file.
>
> pci_pwrctrl_create_device() is static, but it is possible to #ifdef
> the whole function in the .c file and provide the stub in an #else
> branch. That's easier to follow than #ifdef'ing portions of the
> function.
>
+1
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists