[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250524092928.GHaDGReMdD4aFyCBq5@fat_crate.local>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 11:29:28 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, David Kaplan <david.kaplan@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] x86/retbleed: Avoid AUTO after the select step
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 06:20:31PM -0700, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> Retbleed select function leaves the mitigation to AUTO in some cases.
> Moreover, the update function can also set the mitigation to AUTO. This is
> inconsistent with other mitigations and requires explicit handling of AUTO
> at the end of update step.
>
> Make sure a mitigation gets selected in the select step, and do not change
> it to AUTO in the update step. When no mitigation can be selected leave it
> to NONE, which is what AUTO was getting changed to in the end.
>
> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Yap, much better.
Thx.
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists