linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: x1p42100: Add Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bbfc2598-6820-4d0f-ac09-406933771365@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 13:00:58 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Jens Glathe <jens.glathe@...schoolsolutions.biz>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
        Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex.vinarskis@...il.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: x1p42100: Add Lenovo ThinkBook
 16 G7 QOY

On 5/24/25 12:36 PM, Jens Glathe wrote:
> Am 24.05.25 um 12:11 schrieb Dmitry Baryshkov:
>> This will break without the next patch. They need to be squashet into a
>> single patch.
>>
> Changing the order wouldn't suffice?

It would, but that would then mean you're introducing dead (i.e. not
compiled) code in one of the patches

Konrad