[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250524130318.72daea05@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 13:03:18 +0200
From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Donald Hunter
<donald.hunter@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Heiner Kallweit
<hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@....tech>, Dent
Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de, Maxime
Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 07/13] net: pse-pd: Add support for budget
evaluation strategies
Le Sat, 24 May 2025 12:56:09 +0200,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com> a écrit :
> From: Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
>
> This patch introduces the ability to configure the PSE PI budget evaluation
> strategies. Budget evaluation strategies is utilized by PSE controllers to
> determine which ports to turn off first in scenarios such as power budget
> exceedance.
>
> The pis_prio_max value is used to define the maximum priority level
> supported by the controller. Both the current priority and the maximum
> priority are exposed to the user through the pse_ethtool_get_status call.
>
> This patch add support for two mode of budget evaluation strategies.
> 1. Static Method:
>
> This method involves distributing power based on PD classification.
> It’s straightforward and stable, the PSE core keeping track of the
> budget and subtracting the power requested by each PD’s class.
>
> Advantages: Every PD gets its promised power at any time, which
> guarantees reliability.
>
> Disadvantages: PD classification steps are large, meaning devices
> request much more power than they actually need. As a result, the power
> supply may only operate at, say, 50% capacity, which is inefficient and
> wastes money.
>
> Priority max value is matching the number of PSE PIs within the PSE.
>
> 2. Dynamic Method:
>
> To address the inefficiencies of the static method, vendors like
> Microchip have introduced dynamic power budgeting, as seen in the
> PD692x0 firmware. This method monitors the current consumption per port
> and subtracts it from the available power budget. When the budget is
> exceeded, lower-priority ports are shut down.
>
> Advantages: This method optimizes resource utilization, saving costs.
>
> Disadvantages: Low-priority devices may experience instability.
>
> Priority max value is set by the PSE controller driver.
>
> For now, budget evaluation methods are not configurable and cannot be
> mixed. They are hardcoded in the PSE driver itself, as no current PSE
> controller supports both methods.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Forgot to add:
Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
--
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists