[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e462cdc4-7243-4cef-bd1d-a0ef551b3a87@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 12:51:50 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: dt-bindings: mediatek: Constrain iommus
On 25/05/2025 12:48, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, 25 May 2025 at 06:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ovl-2l.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ovl-2l.yaml
>> @@ -45,9 +45,8 @@ properties:
>> - description: OVL-2L Clock
>>
>> iommus:
>> - description:
>> - This property should point to the respective IOMMU block with master port as argument,
>> - see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/mediatek,iommu.yaml for details.
>> + minItems: 1
>> + maxItems: 2
>
> The comment removals are not documented in the commit message, and
> it's not clear why removing information and references would be a good
> thing.
It's obvious, isn't? The consumer shall not define which provider has to
use or how many cells provider has.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists