[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72neLdtGORQ=GMsJ-mVgWscrAw4CB+_2cfbR4gtju4+azw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 23:23:54 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, est31@...tonmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: compile libcore with edition 2024 for 1.87+
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 10:56 AM Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net> wrote:
>
> Rust 1.87 (released on 2025-05-15) compiles core library with edition
> 2024 instead of 2021 [1]. Ensure that the edition matches libcore's
> expectation to avoid potential breakage.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # Needed in 6.12.y and later (Rust is pinned in older LTSs).
> Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138162 [1]
> Closes: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1163
> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>
Applied to `rust-next` -- thanks everyone!
(I actually applied a couple days ago in advance of Monday's -next,
which explains the following report)
[ J3m3 reported in Zulip [2] that the `rust-analyzer` target was
broken after this patch -- indeed, we need to avoid `core-cfgs`
since those are passed to the `rust-analyzer` target.
So, instead, I tweaked the patch to create a new `core-edition`
variable and explicitly mention the `--edition` flag instead of
reusing `core-cfg`s.
In addition, pass a new argument using this new variable to
`generate_rust_analyzer.py` so that we set the right edition there.
By the way, for future reference: the `filter-out` change is needed
for Rust < 1.87, since otherwise we would skip the `--edition=2021`
we just added, ending up with no edition flag, and thus the compiler
would default to the 2015 one.
[2] https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/291565/topic/x/near/520206547
- Miguel ]
I also added:
Reported-by: est31 <est31@...tonmail.com>
since est31 told Gary in RustWeek, and we discussed the patch there.
@Gary: I hope the changes are OK with you (I can put the
`generate_rust_analyzer` ones in a different commit if you prefer).
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists