[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250526063226.GB12811@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 08:32:26 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: hch@....de, xni@...hat.com, colyli@...nel.org, song@...nel.org,
yukuai3@...wei.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com, johnny.chenyi@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/23] md/md-bitmap: add a new sysfs api bitmap_type
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 02:13:03PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> + consistency_policy
.. these doc changes look unrelated, or am I missing something?
> -static void mddev_set_bitmap_ops(struct mddev *mddev, enum md_submodule_id id)
> +static bool mddev_set_bitmap_ops(struct mddev *mddev)
> {
> xa_lock(&md_submodule);
> - mddev->bitmap_ops = xa_load(&md_submodule, id);
> + mddev->bitmap_ops = xa_load(&md_submodule, mddev->bitmap_id);
> xa_unlock(&md_submodule);
> - if (!mddev->bitmap_ops)
> - pr_warn_once("md: can't find bitmap id %d\n", id);
> +
> + if (!mddev->bitmap_ops) {
> + pr_warn_once("md: can't find bitmap id %d\n", mddev->bitmap_id);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
This also looks unrelated and like another prep patch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists