[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQLv3aX0iOrkAZRgP2x8UAVvy7oYA8x0dUPn7B6FD-10-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 18:32:28 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@....de>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: BUG: scheduling while atomic with PREEMPT_RT=y and bpf selftests
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 3:48 PM Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@....de> wrote:
>
> [ T2916] rtlock_slowlock_locked+0x635/0x1d00
> [ T2916] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> [ T2916] ? lock_acquire+0xca/0x300
> [ T2916] rt_spin_lock+0x99/0x190
> [ T2916] task_get_cgroup1+0xe8/0x340
> [ T2916] bpf_task_get_cgroup1+0xe/0x20
Known issue.
Please trim your emails.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists