[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PH7PR12MB8178985B4D738217F7F1E358C065A@PH7PR12MB8178.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 09:03:32 +0000
From: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, "andi.shyti@...nel.org"
<andi.shyti@...nel.org>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org"
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
"digetx@...il.com" <digetx@...il.com>, "p.zabel@...gutronix.de"
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: nvidia,tegra20-i2c: Specify the
required properties
> On 26/05/2025 07:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 26/05/2025 07:25, Akhil R wrote:
> >> Specify the properties which are essential for the Tegra I2C driver
> >> to function correctly. Though all the existing DT nodes have these
> >> properties already, it was not mandated by the DT bindings.
> >
> > I was rather expecting to see explanation why these were missing.
>
> To clarify: I meant, explain the bug/mistake. Rest of explanation is ok.
Oh. Okay. It would have been just missed when it was converted.
Shall I send a new version mentioning that it was missed initially?
Or would the fixes tag suffice as an explanation?
>
> >
> > Fixes: f10a9b722f80 ("dt-bindings: i2c: tegra: Convert to
> > json-schema")
> >
Regards,
Akhil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists