linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/18] page_pool: use netmem APIs to access page->pp_magic in page_pool_page_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250526094305.GA29080@system.software.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 18:43:05 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>, willy@...radead.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel_team@...ynix.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, harry.yoo@...cle.com, hawk@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	john.fastabend@...il.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	asml.silence@...il.com, tariqt@...dia.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com, saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org,
	ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, david@...hat.com,
	lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
	rppt@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
	horms@...nel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	vishal.moola@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] page_pool: use netmem APIs to access
 page->pp_magic in page_pool_page_is_pp()

On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 10:40:30AM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 11:23:07AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 10:21:17AM -0700, Mina Almasry wrote:
> >> > On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 8:26 PM Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > To simplify struct page, the effort to seperate its own descriptor from
> >> > > struct page is required and the work for page pool is on going.
> >> > >
> >> > > To achieve that, all the code should avoid accessing page pool members
> >> > > of struct page directly, but use safe APIs for the purpose.
> >> > >
> >> > > Use netmem_is_pp() instead of directly accessing page->pp_magic in
> >> > > page_pool_page_is_pp().
> >> > >
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
> >> > > ---
> >> > >  include/linux/mm.h   | 5 +----
> >> > >  net/core/page_pool.c | 5 +++++
> >> > >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> > >
> >> > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> >> > > index 8dc012e84033..3f7c80fb73ce 100644
> >> > > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> >> > > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> >> > > @@ -4312,10 +4312,7 @@ int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status);
> >> > >  #define PP_MAGIC_MASK ~(PP_DMA_INDEX_MASK | 0x3UL)
> >> > >
> >> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL
> >> > > -static inline bool page_pool_page_is_pp(struct page *page)
> >> > > -{
> >> > > -       return (page->pp_magic & PP_MAGIC_MASK) == PP_SIGNATURE;
> >> > > -}
> >> > 
> >> > I vote for keeping this function as-is (do not convert it to netmem),
> >> > and instead modify it to access page->netmem_desc->pp_magic.
> >> 
> >> Once the page pool fields are removed from struct page, struct page will
> >> have neither struct netmem_desc nor the fields..
> >> 
> >> So it's unevitable to cast it to netmem_desc in order to refer to
> >> pp_magic.  Again, pp_magic is no longer associated to struct page.
> >
> > Options that come across my mind are:
> >
> >    1. use lru field of struct page instead, with appropriate comment but
> >       looks so ugly.
> >    2. instead of a full word for the magic, use a bit of flags or use
> >       the private field for that purpose.
> >    3. do not check magic number for page pool.
> >    4. more?
> 
> I'm not sure I understand Mina's concern about CPU cycles from casting.
> The casting is a compile-time thing, which shouldn't affect run-time

I didn't mention it but yes.

> performance as long as the check is kept as an inline function. So it's
> "just" a matter of exposing struct netmem_desc to mm.h so it can use it

Then.. we should expose net_iov as well, but I'm afraid it looks weird.
Do you think it's okay?

As I told in another thread, embedding strcut netmem_desc into struct
net_iov will require a huge single patch altering all the users of
struct net_iov.

	Byungchul

> in the inline definition. Unless I'm missing something?
> 
> -Toke