[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250526115931.13937Ce7-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 13:59:31 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, seiden@...ux.ibm.com, nsg@...ux.ibm.com,
nrb@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, schlameuss@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: s390: refactor and split some gmap helpers
On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 01:17:35PM +0200, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 5/20/25 8:26 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > +
> > +obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_KVM)) += gmap_helpers.o
>
> So gmap.o depends on PGSTE but gmap_helpers.o depends on KVM.
> Yes, PGSTE is Y if KVM is set, but this looks really strange.
>
> @Heiko:
> Can we move away from CONFIG_PGSTE and start using CONFIG_KVM instead?
> Well, maybe this goes away with Claudio's rework anyway.
Sure, I'd appreciate if we can get rid of config options.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists