[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5d19df8-c774-4c78-82ca-e0839ed0e539@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 15:06:41 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: yangge1116@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 21cnbao@...il.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, muchun.song@...ux.dev, liuzixing@...on.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: remove redundant folio_test_hugetlb
On 26.05.25 15:05, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 02:23:58PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Already in 6.15, gah.
>>
>> Please convert that code to never ever take any hugeglb locks unless we are
>> clearly dealing with a hugetlb folios.
>
> I guess we could just do?
Yes, anything that involves hugetlb only id there is an indication of
... hugetlb :)
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists