linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: remove redundant folio_test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0da96120-8448-4ee9-ab45-502c292199fd@126.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 21:10:59 +0800
From: Ge Yang <yangge1116@....com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 21cnbao@...il.com,
 baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, muchun.song@...ux.dev, liuzixing@...on.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: remove redundant folio_test_hugetlb



在 2025/5/26 21:06, David Hildenbrand 写道:
> On 26.05.25 15:05, Oscar Salvador wrote:
>> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 02:23:58PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> Already in 6.15, gah.
>>>
>>> Please convert that code to never ever take any hugeglb locks unless 
>>> we are
>>> clearly dealing with a hugetlb folios.
>>
>> I guess we could just do?
> 
> Yes, anything that involves hugetlb only id there is an indication 
> of ... hugetlb :)
> 

Okay, thanks. I'll adjust the patch again.