linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 4/5] drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250526132755.166150-5-acarmina@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 13:27:54 +0000
From: Alessandro Carminati <acarmina@...hat.com>
To: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Daniel Diaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
	David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
	Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo@...eup.net>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
	Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Alessandro Carminati <alessandro.carminati@...il.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
	Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Alessandro Carminati <acarmina@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/5] drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>

The drm_test_rect_calc_hscale and drm_test_rect_calc_vscale unit tests
intentionally trigger warning backtraces by providing bad parameters to
the tested functions. What is tested is the return value, not the existence
of a warning backtrace. Suppress the backtraces to avoid clogging the
kernel log and distraction from real problems.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Carminati <acarmina@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c
index 17e1f34b7610..867845e7d5ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c
@@ -406,22 +406,38 @@ KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(drm_rect_scale, drm_rect_scale_cases, drm_rect_scale_case_desc
 
 static void drm_test_rect_calc_hscale(struct kunit *test)
 {
+	KUNIT_DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(drm_calc_scale);
 	const struct drm_rect_scale_case *params = test->param_value;
 	int scaling_factor;
 
+	/*
+	 * drm_rect_calc_hscale() generates a warning backtrace whenever bad
+	 * parameters are passed to it. This affects all unit tests with an
+	 * error code in expected_scaling_factor.
+	 */
+	KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(drm_calc_scale);
 	scaling_factor = drm_rect_calc_hscale(&params->src, &params->dst,
 					      params->min_range, params->max_range);
+	KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(drm_calc_scale);
 
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scaling_factor, params->expected_scaling_factor);
 }
 
 static void drm_test_rect_calc_vscale(struct kunit *test)
 {
+	KUNIT_DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(drm_calc_scale);
 	const struct drm_rect_scale_case *params = test->param_value;
 	int scaling_factor;
 
+	/*
+	 * drm_rect_calc_vscale() generates a warning backtrace whenever bad
+	 * parameters are passed to it. This affects all unit tests with an
+	 * error code in expected_scaling_factor.
+	 */
+	KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(drm_calc_scale);
 	scaling_factor = drm_rect_calc_vscale(&params->src, &params->dst,
 					      params->min_range, params->max_range);
+	KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(drm_calc_scale);
 
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scaling_factor, params->expected_scaling_factor);
 }
-- 
2.34.1