[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aec5d09f-248b-4dcc-8536-89b4b9d47e9c@bp.renesas.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 16:02:39 +0200
From: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@...renesas.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
tomm.merciai@...il.com, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
biju.das.jz@...renesas.com, Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, Jesse Van Gavere <jesseevg@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: adv7511: Do not merge adv7511_mode_set() with
atomic_enable()
Hi All,
Thanks for your comments.
On 26/05/25 15:18, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 26/05/2025 14:40, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 01:19:23PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
>>> Hi Laurent,
>>> Thanks for your comment.
>>>
>>> On 26/05/25 12:49, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 11:58:37AM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
>>>>> Hi Maxime,
>>>>> Thanks for your comment.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26/05/25 11:26, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 10:54:52AM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
>>>>>>> After adv7511_mode_set() was merged into .atomic_enable(), only the
>>>>>>> native resolution is working when using modetest.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is caused by incorrect timings: adv7511_mode_set() must not be
>>>>>>> merged into .atomic_enable().
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Move adv7511_mode_set() back to the .mode_set() callback in
>>>>>>> drm_bridge_funcs to restore correct behavior.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fixes: 0a9e2f0a6466 ("drm/bridge: adv7511: switch to the HDMI
>>>>>>> connector helpers")
>>>>>>> Reported-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
>>>>>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aDB8bD6cF7qiSpKd@tom-desktop/
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@...renesas.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Explaining why, both in the commit log and the comments, would be
>>>>>> nice.
>>>>>> Because I can't think of any good reason it just can't work for that
>>>>>> bridge.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, let me clarify and share with you some details:
>>>>>
>>>>> adv7511_mode_set:
>>>>> - Is setting up timings registers for the DSI2HDMI bridge in
>>>>> our case
>>>>> we are using ADV7535 bridge.
>>>>>
>>>>> rzg2l_mipi_dsi_atomic_enable:
>>>>> - Is setting up the vclock for the DSI ip
>>>>>
>>>>> Testing new/old implementation a bit we found the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> root@...rc-rzg3e:~# modetest -M rzg2l-du -d -s HDMI-
>>>>> A-1:800x600-56.25@...4
>>>>> setting mode 800x600-56.25Hz on connectors HDMI-A-1, crtc 62
>>>>> [ 49.273134] adv7511_mode_set_old: drm_mode_vrefresh(mode) = 56
>>>>> [ 49.281006] rzg2l_mipi_dsi_atomic_enable: mode->clock: 36000
>>>>>
>>>>> root@...rc-rzg3e:~# modetest -M rzg2l-du -d -s HDMI-
>>>>> A-1:800x600-56.25@...4
>>>>> setting mode 800x600-56.25Hz on connectors HDMI-A-1, crtc 62
>>>>> [ 74.076881] rzg2l_mipi_dsi_atomic_enable: mode->clock: 36000
>>>>> [ 74.092130] adv7511_mode_set: drm_mode_vrefresh(adj_mode) = 56
>>>>>
>>>>> Same result but different timing (in function call perspective):
>>>>>
>>>>> - old: adv7511_mode_set() is call before
>>>>> rzg2l_mipi_dsi_atomic_enable()
>>>>> - new: adv7511_mode_set() is call after
>>>>> rzg2l_mipi_dsi_atomic_enable()
>>>>
>>>> What is "old" and "new" here ? Is it before and after Dmitry's
>>>> patch, or
>>>> before and after yours ? Please be precise when describing problems.
>>>
>>> Sorry, you are completely right:
>>>
>>> - old --> before Dmitry's patch
>>> - new --> after Dmitry's patch
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> What do you think? Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> You're only explaining above what the "old" and "new" behaviours are,
>>>> and claiming one of them is causing an issue, but you're not explaining
>>>> *why* it causes an issue. That's what your commit message is
>>>> expected to
>>>> detail.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the clarification! :)
>>> I will send v2 explaining better this.
>>
>> In particular, if the driver needs to have mode_set called before
>> atomic_enable, you should say why moving the call to mode_set earlier in
>> the function wouldn't work.
>
> It might be the same thing as we had on PS8640: it had to be brought up
> before the host starts the DSI link, so that there is no clock input on
> the DSI clock lane.
>
Some updates on my side:
I'm not seeing any differences from a regs perspective when using the
old driver version (before Dmitry's patch) and the new driver version
(after Dmitry's patch).
In particular, i2cdump -f -y 7 0x4c shows me the same result.
Unfortunately, since I don't have the ADV7535 datasheet, I believe this
issue may be related to the functions call sequence.
I agree with Dmitry's theory.
Let me gently know if you need some more test on my side. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Tommaso
Powered by blists - more mailing lists