linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/18] mlx5: use netmem descriptor and APIs for page pool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250526030858.GA56990@system.software.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 12:08:58 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc: willy@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	kernel_team@...ynix.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, harry.yoo@...cle.com, hawk@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	john.fastabend@...il.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	asml.silence@...il.com, toke@...hat.com, tariqt@...dia.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
	leon@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
	david@...hat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
	Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org,
	surenb@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, horms@...nel.org,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	vishal.moola@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/18] mlx5: use netmem descriptor and APIs for page pool

On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 10:13:27AM -0700, Mina Almasry wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 8:26 PM Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> wrote:
> >
> > To simplify struct page, the effort to seperate its own descriptor from
> > struct page is required and the work for page pool is on going.
> >
> > Use netmem descriptor and APIs for page pool in mlx5 code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
> 
> Just FYI, you're racing with Nvidia adding netmem support to mlx5 as
> well. Probably they prefer to take their patch. So try to rebase on
> top of that maybe? Up to you.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1747950086-1246773-9-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com/
> 
> I also wonder if you should send this through the net-next tree, since
> it seem to race with changes that are going to land in net-next soon.
> Up to you, I don't have any strong preference. But if you do send to
> net-next, there are a bunch of extra rules to keep in mind:
> 
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html

I can send to net-next, but is it okay even if it's more than 15 patches?

	Byungchul
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Mina