linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: fix suspend and resume triggering for bmi160 and bmi270

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86d1b019-faec-40ab-b850-8fad22dc4321@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 22:13:00 +0200
From: Denis Benato <benato.denis96@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, David Lechner
 <dlechner@...libre.com>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
 Alex Lanzano <lanzano.alex@...il.com>,
 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Danila Tikhonov <danila@...xyga.com>,
 Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 "Derek J . Clark" <derekjohn.clark@...il.com>,
 Philip Müller <philm@...jaro.org>,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: fix suspend and resume triggering for bmi160
 and bmi270

On 5/26/25 21:58, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 04:25:28PM +0200, Denis Benato wrote:
>> Two imu devices bmi160 and bmi270 are similar to bmi323, with the same bug and
>> a common usecase: fix the aforementioned bug about triggering not resuming
>> after sleep in the same way it was solved for the bmi323 device driver.
>>
>> The bmi270 patch has been tested on a device where the device irq pin
>> is connected to the CPU ensuring it doesn't cause harm to devices that
>> do not use hrtimer or other external triggers.
>>
>> Changelog from v1 [1]
>> - include linux/pm.h where needed
>> - used "Closed" to reference the solved issue for each driver
>> - merged two lines into one (on both drivers)
> I got this series twice without any (?) difference in the versions. Care to
> explain what's going on?
>
>
I am sorry: mails were not being sent to the main lkml nor the iio mailing list and so
I resent to everybody, otherwise doing "answer to all" would have created a mess
where discussions would get lost.