[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250527172018.GF8333@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 19:20:18 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...weicloud.com>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
jannh@...gle.com, pfalcato@...e.de, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pulehui@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] mm/mremap: Fix uprobe anon page be
overwritten when expanding vma during mremap
Hi Lehui,
On 05/28, Pu Lehui wrote:
>
> On 2025/5/27 22:23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >Well, I leave this to you / Lorenzo / David, but...
> >
> >On 05/27, Pu Lehui wrote:
> >>
> >>Fixes: 78a320542e6c ("uprobes: Change valid_vma() to demand VM_MAYEXEC rather than VM_EXEC")
> >
> >I don't think that commit could cause this problem.
>
> Hi Oleg,
>
> Me too! I was test that before and after commit 78a320542e6c, so call it the
> `directly related commit`.
I feel I am totally confused...
but _may be_ you have used the initial reproducer which used PROT_NONE in
void *addr2 = mmap(NULL, 2 * 4096, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0);
?
If yes. I _think_ we should have the same problem with or without 78a320542e6c,
just you need to s/PROT_NONE/PROT_EXEC/.
> In fact, I think the issue was introduced in the
> original commit 2b1444983508 ("uprobes, mm, x86: Add the ability to install
> and remove uprobes breakpoints") # v3.5-rc1.
probably yes... Damn I don't know ;)
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists