[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250527193439.GA1101149-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 14:34:39 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org>,
Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: gpio: rockchip: Allow use of a
power-domain
On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 10:06:53PM +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> The GPIO controllers in most Rockchip SoCs are part or power domains
> that are always powered on, i.e. PD_BUS or PD_PMU.
Are these described in DT, so this is valid to add for all SoCs?
> On RK3528 the GPIO controllers are spread out among the PD_RKVENC, PD_VO
> and PD_VPU power domains.
So should be required for RK3528?
>
> Add support to describe power-domains for the GPIO controllers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml
> index d76987ce8e50..bdd83f42615c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/rockchip,gpio-bank.yaml
> @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ properties:
> "#interrupt-cells":
> const: 2
>
> + power-domains:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> patternProperties:
> "^.+-hog(-[0-9]+)?$":
> type: object
> --
> 2.49.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists