[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SA1PR12MB71990A84FDB4350DC02CEC6EB064A@SA1PR12MB7199.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 04:33:41 +0000
From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: "maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>, "oliver.upton@...ux.dev"
<oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, "joey.gouly@....com" <joey.gouly@....com>,
"suzuki.poulose@....com" <suzuki.poulose@....com>, "yuzenghui@...wei.com"
<yuzenghui@...wei.com>, "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "ryan.roberts@....com"
<ryan.roberts@....com>, "shahuang@...hat.com" <shahuang@...hat.com>,
"lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, "david@...hat.com"
<david@...hat.com>, Aniket Agashe <aniketa@...dia.com>, Neo Jia
<cjia@...dia.com>, Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>, Krishnakant Jaju
<kjaju@...dia.com>, "Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)" <targupta@...dia.com>, Vikram
Sethi <vsethi@...dia.com>, Andy Currid <acurrid@...dia.com>, Alistair Popple
<apopple@...dia.com>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Dan Williams
<danw@...dia.com>, Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>, Matt Ochs <mochs@...dia.com>,
Uday Dhoke <udhoke@...dia.com>, Dheeraj Nigam <dnigam@...dia.com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"sebastianene@...gle.com" <sebastianene@...gle.com>, "coltonlewis@...gle.com"
<coltonlewis@...gle.com>, "kevin.tian@...el.com" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"yi.l.liu@...el.com" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "ardb@...nel.org"
<ardb@...nel.org>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"gshan@...hat.com" <gshan@...hat.com>, "linux-mm@...ck.org"
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, "ddutile@...hat.com" <ddutile@...hat.com>,
"tabba@...gle.com" <tabba@...gle.com>, "qperret@...gle.com"
<qperret@...gle.com>, "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "maobibo@...ngson.cn"
<maobibo@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] kvm: arm64: New memslot flag to indicate cacheable
mapping
> I thought we agreed not to do this? Sean was strongly against it
> right?
> There is no easy way for VFIO to know to set it, and the kernel will
> not allow switching a cachable VMA to non-cachable anyhow.
> So all it does is make it harder to create a memslot.
Oliver had mentioned earlier that he would still prefer a memslot flag as
VMM should convey its intent through that flag:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/aAdKCGCuwlUeUXKY@linux.dev/
Oliver, could you please confirm if you are convinced with not having this
flag? Can we rely on MT_NORMAL in vma mapping to convey this?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists