[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADvTj4oVj-38ohw7Na9rkXLTGEEFkLv=4S40GPvHM5eZnN7KyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 14:37:03 -0600
From: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: stmmac: allow drivers to explicitly select
PHY device
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 2:30 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> > Sure, that may make sense to do as well, but I still don't see
> > how that impacts the need to runtime select the PHY which
> > is configured for the correct MFD.
>
> If you know what variant you have, you only include the one PHY you
> actually have, and phy-handle points to it, just as normal. No runtime
> selection.
Oh, so here's the issue, we have both PHY variants, older hardware
generally has AC200 PHY's while newer ships AC300 PHY's, but
when I surveyed our deployed hardware using these boards many
systems of similar age would randomly mix AC200 and AC300 PHY's.
It appears there was a fairly long transition period where both variants
were being shipped.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists