lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10cf162e-ca02-44b0-b238-74a93fe05f54@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 23:42:25 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Mikael Wessel <post@...aelkw.online>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
	torvalds@...uxfoundation.org, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
	przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	security@...nel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000e: fix heap overflow in e1000_set_eeprom()

On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 11:13:32PM +0200, Mikael Wessel wrote:
> The ETHTOOL_SETEEPROM ioctl copies user data into a kmalloc'ed buffer
> without validating eeprom->len and eeprom->offset. A CAP_NET_ADMIN
> user can overflow the heap and crash the kernel or gain code execution.
> 
> Validate length and offset before kmalloc() to avoid leaking eeprom_buff.
> 
> Fixes: bc7f75fa9788 ("[E1000E]: New pci-express e1000 driver (currently for ICH9 devices only)")
> Reported-by: Mikael Wessel <post@...aelkw.online>
> Signed-off-by: Mikael Wessel <post@...aelkw.online>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c
> index 98e541e39730..d04e59528619 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c
> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int e1000_set_eeprom(struct net_device *netdev,
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
>  	if (eeprom->magic !=
> -	    (adapter->pdev->vendor | (adapter->pdev->device << 16)))
> +		(adapter->pdev->vendor | (adapter->pdev->device << 16)))
>  		return -EFAULT;

That look like a white space change, which should not be part of a
fix.

Please also take a read of

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html

You need to set the tree in the Subject line.

    Andrew

---
pw-bot: cr
	

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ