[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be687d2d-4c16-46d6-8828-b0e4866d91de@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 07:43:57 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: 李哲 <sensor1010@....com>, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
jonas@...boo.se, rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, david.wu@...k-chips.com,
wens@...e.org, jan.petrous@....nxp.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dwmac-rk: No need to check the return value of the
phy_power_on()
Le 26/05/2025 à 18:16, 李哲 a écrit :
> since the return value of the phy_power_on() function is always 0,
> checking its return value is redundant.
Can you elaborate why?
Looking at (1], I think that it is obvious that non-0 values can be
returned.
CJ
[1]:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.15/source/drivers/phy/phy-core.c#L305
>
> Signed-off-by: 李哲 <sensor1010@....com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> index 700858ff6f7c..6e8b10fda24d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> @@ -1839,11 +1839,7 @@ static int rk_gmac_powerup(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv)
> dev_err(dev, "NO interface defined!\n");
> }
>
> - ret = phy_power_on(bsp_priv, true);
> - if (ret) {
> - gmac_clk_enable(bsp_priv, false);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + phy_power_on(bsp_priv, true);
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists