[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72m2jztPbqiH19560RTBW0PUghi8ajjyi6Pw6jmrHFdtSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 10:39:27 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: opp: Move `cfg(CONFIG_OF)` attribute to the top of
doc test
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 7:33 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Sorry for the trouble, one more patch to apply :(
Sorry, to be clear, I meant it as a discussion, i.e. no need to send a
patch for this in a hurry!
It is just something we did for another example, but it is not a
guideline or anything yet (it may not be a good idea, in fact -- I was
hoping for others to chime in). Even if it were, there is no rush to
"fix" it :)
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists