[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aDWjG9jAJ7kSaC9b@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 14:33:47 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>,
Rahul Pathak <rpathak@...tanamicro.com>,
Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/23] irqchip: Add driver for the RPMI system MSI
service group
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 02:17:00PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> The RPMI specification defines a system MSI service group which
> allows application processors to receive MSIs upon system events
> such as graceful shutdown/reboot request, CPU hotplug event, memory
> hotplug event, etc.
>
> Add an irqchip driver for the RISC-V RPMI system MSI service group
> to directly receive system MSIs in Linux kernel.
...
> +#include <linux/device.h>
Perhaps I missed something, but devm_kzalloc() is in device/devres.h. Do you
need it for something else?
> +#include <linux/dev_printk.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox/riscv-rpmi-message.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/msi.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <vdso/bits.h>
Just make it linux/bits.h as vdso is for user space libvdso and related.
But
+ asm/byteorder.h
...
> +static void rpmi_sysmsi_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct rpmi_sysmsi_priv *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
Declare temporary variable for hwirq and do irqd_to_hwirq() only once.
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rpmi_sysmsi_set_msi_state(priv, irqd_to_hwirq(d), 0);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_warn(priv->dev, "Failed to mask hwirq %lu (error %d)\n",
> + irqd_to_hwirq(d), ret);
> + }
> + irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
> +}
...
> +static void rpmi_sysmsi_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
Ditto.
...
> +static void rpmi_sysmsi_set_desc(msi_alloc_info_t *arg, struct msi_desc *desc)
> +{
> + arg->desc = desc;
> + arg->hwirq = (u32)desc->data.icookie.value;
Hmm... Why do you need an explicit casting?
> +}
...
> + if (WARN_ON(fwspec->param_count < 1))
+ bug.h
> + return -EINVAL;
+ errno.h (but actually you need err.h due to PTR_ERR() et al.)
...
> +static int rpmi_sysmsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct rpmi_sysmsi_priv *priv;
> + int rc;
Be consistent with variable naming for the same (semantically) stuff.
> + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + priv->dev = dev;
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
How is being used?
> +
> + /* Setup mailbox client */
> + priv->client.dev = priv->dev;
> + priv->client.rx_callback = NULL;
> + priv->client.tx_block = false;
> + priv->client.knows_txdone = true;
> + priv->client.tx_tout = 0;
> +
> + /* Request mailbox channel */
> + priv->chan = mbox_request_channel(&priv->client, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->chan))
> + return PTR_ERR(priv->chan);
> +
> + /* Get number of system MSIs */
> + rc = rpmi_sysmsi_get_num_msi(priv);
> + if (rc < 1) {
> + mbox_free_channel(priv->chan);
> + if (rc)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, rc, "Failed to get number of system MSIs\n");
> + else
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "No system MSIs found\n");
> + }
> + priv->nr_irqs = rc;
> +
> + /* Set the device MSI domain if not available */
> + if (!dev_get_msi_domain(dev)) {
> + /*
> + * The device MSI domain for OF devices is only set at the
> + * time of populating/creating OF device. If the device MSI
> + * domain is discovered later after the OF device is created
> + * then we need to set it explicitly before using any platform
> + * MSI functions.
> + */
> + if (is_of_node(dev_fwnode(dev)))
> + of_msi_configure(dev, to_of_node(dev_fwnode(dev)));
if (dev_of_node(dev))
of_msi_configure(dev, dev_of_node(dev));
> + if (!dev_get_msi_domain(dev)) {
> + mbox_free_channel(priv->chan);
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!msi_create_device_irq_domain(dev, MSI_DEFAULT_DOMAIN,
> + &rpmi_sysmsi_template,
> + priv->nr_irqs, priv, priv)) {
> + mbox_free_channel(priv->chan);
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "failed to create MSI irq domain\n");
> + }
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "%u system MSIs registered\n", priv->nr_irqs);
> + return 0;
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists