linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi-qpic-snand: reallocate BAM transactions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <831876a9-4f2c-47af-aa4d-3151e13b6bef@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 14:23:40 +0200
From: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>,
 Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>,
 Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>,
 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
 linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi-qpic-snand: reallocate BAM transactions

2025. 05. 27. 13:28 keltezéssel, Mark Brown írta:
> On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 07:05:35PM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote:
> 
>>   # reboot
>>   [  877.178844] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at virtual address 0000000000000078
>>   [  877.178913] Mem abort info:
>>   [  877.186767]   ESR = 0x0000000096000005
>>   [  877.189508]   EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
>>   [  877.193312]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
>>   [  877.198780]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> 
> Please think hard before including complete backtraces in upstream
> reports, they are very large and contain almost no useful information
> relative to their size so often obscure the relevant content in your
> message. If part of the backtrace is usefully illustrative (it often is
> for search engines if nothing else) then it's usually better to pull out
> the relevant sections.

Sorry about that. I try to avoid doing that in the future.

-Gabor