linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/12] rv: Add monitors to validate task switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250527135111.NFCeqkvT@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 15:51:11 +0200
From: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Tomas Glozar <tglozar@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/12] rv: Add monitors to validate task switch

On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 09:31:38AM +0200, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 09:15 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 10:43:02AM +0200, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> > > I'm keeping this as RFC as I'm planning to make it ready after
> > > merging
> > > the LTL series [1]
> > > 
> > > This series adds three monitors to the sched collection, extends
> > > and
> > > replaces previously existing monitors:
> > 
> > What is your base? I cannot apply the series (maybe because I'm
> > illiterate
> > on git...)
> 
> Mmh, it /was/ linux-next, I'm not sure if that gets rebased and breaks
> stuff, but it shouldn't.

Turned out it was because this series conflicts with ac01fa73f530
("tracepoint: Have tracepoints created with DECLARE_TRACE() have _tp
suffix")

I resolved the conflict while applying, and all is good.

Nam