[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10720.1748358103@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 16:01:43 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] rxrpc: Fix return from none_validate_challenge()
Fix the return value of none_validate_challenge() to be explicitly true
(which indicates the source packet should simply be discarded) rather than
implicitly true (because rxrpc_abort_conn() always returns -EPROTO which
gets converted to true).
Note that this change doesn't change the behaviour of the code (which is
correct by accident) and, in any case, we *shouldn't* get a CHALLENGE
packet to an rxnull connection (ie. no security).
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Closes: https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2025-April/009738.html
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
---
net/rxrpc/insecure.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/insecure.c b/net/rxrpc/insecure.c
index 1f7c136d6d0e..0a260df45d25 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/insecure.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/insecure.c
@@ -45,8 +45,9 @@ static void none_free_call_crypto(struct rxrpc_call *call)
static bool none_validate_challenge(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- return rxrpc_abort_conn(conn, skb, RX_PROTOCOL_ERROR, -EPROTO,
- rxrpc_eproto_rxnull_challenge);
+ rxrpc_abort_conn(conn, skb, RX_PROTOCOL_ERROR, -EPROTO,
+ rxrpc_eproto_rxnull_challenge);
+ return true;
}
static int none_sendmsg_respond_to_challenge(struct sk_buff *challenge,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists