[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b16c5df-94e2-43b0-876f-a5070ac71ba0@whut.edu.cn>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 23:07:40 +0800
From: Ze Huang <huangze@...t.edu.cn>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sophgo@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: pinctrl: k230: fix child node name patterns
On 5/27/25 10:36 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 12:23:35AM +0800, Ze Huang wrote:
>> Rename child node name patterns to align with conventions.
>>
>> uart0-pins => uart0-cfg
>> uart0-cfg uart0-pins
>>
>> This avoids potential confusion and improves consistency with existing
>> bindings like sophgo,sg2042-pinctrl and starfive,jh7110-aon-pinctrl.
>>
>> Fixes: 561f3e9d21a1 ("dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add support for canaan,k230 SoC")
> You're changing something merged in October of last year, which is an
> ABI break, for what seems like a cosmetic change to me. What makes this
> worth it? Consistency with some devices by other vendors isn't a strong
> argument I don't think.
Thanks for the feedback.
You're right - this change would introduce an ABI break just for naming
consistency, there’s no strong functional benefit.
>> Signed-off-by: Ze Huang <huangze@...t.edu.cn>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml
>> index 0b462eb6dfe169a292bf716503c03d029f1ac7ee..f4e0da0bf7fa30af5132644109dbd371ddfc0228 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/canaan,k230-pinctrl.yaml
>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ properties:
>> maxItems: 1
>>
>> patternProperties:
>> - '-pins$':
>> + '-cfg$':
>> type: object
>> additionalProperties: false
>> description:
>> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ patternProperties:
>> pinctrl groups available on the machine.
>>
>> patternProperties:
>> - '-cfg$':
>> + '-pins$':
>> type: object
>> allOf:
>> - $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/pincfg-node.yaml
>> @@ -112,8 +112,8 @@ examples:
>> compatible = "canaan,k230-pinctrl";
>> reg = <0x91105000 0x100>;
>>
>> - uart2-pins {
>> - uart2-pins-cfg {
>> + uart2-cfg {
>> + uart2-pins {
>> pinmux = <0x503>, /* uart2 txd */
>> <0x603>; /* uart2 rxd */
>> slew-rate = <0>;
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 0a4b866d08c6adaea2f4592d31edac6deeb4dcbd
>> change-id: 20250526-k230-binding-fix-3125ff43f930
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Ze Huang <huangze@...t.edu.cn>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists