[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aDXbiVropGMSToC5@mini-arch>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 08:34:33 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
sdf@...ichev.me, ap420073@...il.com, praan@...gle.com,
shivajikant@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] net: devmem: move list_add to
net_devmem_bind_dmabuf.
On 05/23, Mina Almasry wrote:
> It's annoying for the list_add to be outside net_devmem_bind_dmabuf, but
> the list_del is in net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf. Make it consistent by
> having both the list_add/del be inside the net_devmem_[un]bind_dmabuf.
>
> Cc: ap420073@...il.com
> Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
> Tested-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists