[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA3_GnrVyeXtLjhZ_d9=0x58YmK+a9yADfp+LRCBHQo_TEDyvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 23:35:59 +0900
From: 戸田晃太 <kota.toda@...-cybersecurity.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
小池悠生 <yuki.koike@...-cybersecurity.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: Fix header_ops type confusion
Thank you for your review.
2025年5月26日(月) 17:23 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>:
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 10:08 PM 戸田晃太 <kota.toda@...-cybersecurity.com> wrote:
> >
> > In bond_setup_by_slave(), the slave’s header_ops are unconditionally
> > copied into the bonding device. As a result, the bonding device may invoke
> > the slave-specific header operations on itself, causing
> > netdev_priv(bond_dev) (a struct bonding) to be incorrectly interpreted
> > as the slave's private-data type.
> >
> > This type-confusion bug can lead to out-of-bounds writes into the skb,
> > resulting in memory corruption.
> >
> > This patch adds two members to struct bonding, bond_header_ops and
> > header_slave_dev, to avoid type-confusion while keeping track of the
> > slave's header_ops.
> >
> > Fixes: 1284cd3a2b740 (bonding: two small fixes for IPoIB support)
> > Signed-off-by: Kota Toda <kota.toda@...-cybersecurity.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yuki Koike <yuki.koike@...-cybersecurity.com>
> > Co-Developed-by: Yuki Koike <yuki.koike@...-cybersecurity.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> > Reported-by: Kota Toda <kota.toda@...-cybersecurity.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 61
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/net/bonding.h | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > index 8ea183da8d53..690f3e0971d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> > @@ -1619,14 +1619,65 @@ static void bond_compute_features(struct bonding *bond)
> > netdev_change_features(bond_dev);
> > }
> >
> > +static int bond_hard_header(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> > + unsigned short type, const void *daddr,
> > + const void *saddr, unsigned int len)
> > +{
> > + struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + struct net_device *slave_dev;
> > +
> > + slave_dev = bond->header_slave_dev;
> > +
> > + return dev_hard_header(skb, slave_dev, type, daddr, saddr, len);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void bond_header_cache_update(struct hh_cache *hh, const
> > struct net_device *dev,
> > + const unsigned char *haddr)
> > +{
> > + const struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + struct net_device *slave_dev;
> > +
> > + slave_dev = bond->header_slave_dev;
>
> I do not see any barrier ?
>
> > +
> > + if (!slave_dev->header_ops || !slave_dev->header_ops->cache_update)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + slave_dev->header_ops->cache_update(hh, slave_dev, haddr);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void bond_setup_by_slave(struct net_device *bond_dev,
> > struct net_device *slave_dev)
> > {
> > + struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
> > bool was_up = !!(bond_dev->flags & IFF_UP);
> >
> > dev_close(bond_dev);
> >
> > - bond_dev->header_ops = slave_dev->header_ops;
> > + /* Some functions are given dev as an argument
> > + * while others not. When dev is not given, we cannot
> > + * find out what is the slave device through struct bonding
> > + * (the private data of bond_dev). Therefore, we need a raw
> > + * header_ops variable instead of its pointer to const header_ops
> > + * and assign slave's functions directly.
> > + * For the other case, we set the wrapper functions that pass
> > + * slave_dev to the wrapped functions.
> > + */
> > + bond->bond_header_ops.create = bond_hard_header;
> > + bond->bond_header_ops.cache_update = bond_header_cache_update;
> > + if (slave_dev->header_ops) {
> > + bond->bond_header_ops.parse = slave_dev->header_ops->parse;
> > + bond->bond_header_ops.cache = slave_dev->header_ops->cache;
> > + bond->bond_header_ops.validate = slave_dev->header_ops->validate;
> > + bond->bond_header_ops.parse_protocol =
> > slave_dev->header_ops->parse_protocol;
>
> All these updates probably need WRITE_ONCE(), and corresponding
> READ_ONCE() on reader sides, at a very minimum ...
>
> RCU would even be better later.
>
I believe that locking is not necessary in this patch. The update of
`header_ops` only happens when a slave is newly enslaved to a bond.
Under such circumstances, members of `header_ops` are not called in
parallel with updating. Therefore, there is no possibility of race
conditions occurring.
>
> > + } else {
> > + bond->bond_header_ops.parse = NULL;
> > + bond->bond_header_ops.cache = NULL;
> > + bond->bond_header_ops.validate = NULL;
> > + bond->bond_header_ops.parse_protocol = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + bond->header_slave_dev = slave_dev;
> > + bond_dev->header_ops = &bond->bond_header_ops;
> >
> > bond_dev->type = slave_dev->type;
> > bond_dev->hard_header_len = slave_dev->hard_header_len;
> > @@ -2676,6 +2727,14 @@ static int bond_release_and_destroy(struct
> > net_device *bond_dev,
> > struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
> > int ret;
> >
> > + /* If slave_dev is the earliest registered one, we must clear
> > + * the variables related to header_ops to avoid dangling pointer.
> > + */
> > + if (bond->header_slave_dev == slave_dev) {
> > + bond->header_slave_dev = NULL;
> > + bond_dev->header_ops = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > ret = __bond_release_one(bond_dev, slave_dev, false, true);
> > if (ret == 0 && !bond_has_slaves(bond) &&
> > bond_dev->reg_state != NETREG_UNREGISTERING) {
> > diff --git a/include/net/bonding.h b/include/net/bonding.h
> > index 95f67b308c19..cf8206187ce9 100644
> > --- a/include/net/bonding.h
> > +++ b/include/net/bonding.h
> > @@ -215,6 +215,11 @@ struct bond_ipsec {
> > */
> > struct bonding {
> > struct net_device *dev; /* first - useful for panic debug */
> > + struct net_device *header_slave_dev; /* slave net_device for
> > header_ops */
> > + /* maintained as a non-const variable
> > + * because bond's header_ops should change depending on slaves.
> > + */
> > + struct header_ops bond_header_ops;
> > struct slave __rcu *curr_active_slave;
> > struct slave __rcu *current_arp_slave;
> > struct slave __rcu *primary_slave;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists