[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250528123046.5577977f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 12:30:46 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Trace Kernel
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Removed unnecessary if() goto out where
out is the next line
On Wed, 28 May 2025 09:34:55 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> OK, so this is a kind of cleanup.
Correct, which is why I only added a "Fixes" tag but not a "stable" tag.
If someone wants to backport this, let them ;-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thanks,
-- Steve
>
> Thanks,
>
> > Fixes: a389d86f7fd0 ("ring-buffer: Have nested events still record running time stamp")
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists