lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6fd7a4ee0a9001d9cb0995719df5b88bcd56a870.camel@dubeyko.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 10:18:57 -0700
From: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@...eyko.com>
To: 李扬韬 <frank.li@...o.com>, 
 "glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de"	 <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>, Andrew
 Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,  "Ernesto A."
 Fernández	 <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, 
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
 "syzbot+8c0bc9f818702ff75b76@...kaller.appspotmail.com"
	 <syzbot+8c0bc9f818702ff75b76@...kaller.appspotmail.com>, 
 "Slava.Dubeyko@....com"
	 <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>
Subject: Re: 回复: 回复: [PATCH] hfsplus: remove mutex_lock check
 in hfsplus_free_extents

On Wed, 2025-05-28 at 17:01 +0000, 李扬韬 wrote:
> Hi Slava,
> 
> > Could you please rework the patch comment by means of adding
> > precise explanation of this?  
> 
> I don't quite get your point. Would you mind adding a comment or
> editing it here? : ) 
> 

I see your point. We need accurately explain here that several threads
could try to lock the shared extents tree. And warning can be triggered
in one thread when another thread has locked the tree. This is the
wrong behavior of the code and we need to remove the warning.

This is what I meant here.

Thanks,
Slava.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ