[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALHNRZ-r_U+ByS0FWxamv9ozzjBWdkqAh2wJOt3s3cMsX6K_kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 12:41:17 -0500
From: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@...il.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] memory: tegra210-emc: Support Device Tree EMC Tables
On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 7:48 AM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 07:27:52AM -0500, Aaron Kling wrote:
> [...]
> > The devices I'm talking about are not yet end of life, so it is
> > physically possible for them to get a bootloader update to conform to
> > the existing mainline model. But I'm just one guy trying to do 3rd
> > party support for these devices, I can't affect what Nvidia does with
> > the signed bootloader on these devices. I'd love to be able to swap
> > out an open source bootloader on these, but the secure boot setup
> > prevents that.
>
> I've reached out to our Android team internally to see if there's
> anything we can realistically do about this.
>
> Thierry
Thierry, has there been any feedback about this?
Sincerely,
Aaron
Powered by blists - more mailing lists